Bij de Möllerwerf in Hengelo hangt het werk ‘Lekker bezig’ nr.32. LINK
In de webshop: LINK
However, there are a few things that could be improved:
Overall, this is a good sketch with potential for further improvement.
Overall Composition and Perspective:
Shading and Texture:
Line Work:
Additional Tips:
Remember, these are just suggestions. Feel free to experiment and find what works best for you. Drawing is a personal and creative process, so have fun with it!
If you'd like, share another drawing and I'll provide specific feedback on how to improve it.
The image appears to be a sketch of a scene with three figures sitting at a table. The figures are drawn with simple lines, and their faces are not clearly defined. The background is filled with orange and yellow lines, which could represent flames or heat. There is also a horizontal line across the top of the image, which could be a power line or a beam of light.
Here are some possible interpretations of the image:
The meaning of the image is open to interpretation, and there is no single correct answer.
Gemini AI (Made by Google)
Ik zie een tekening van een zwarte cirkel, een potlood en een lijn oranje potloodstreken. Het potlood werpt een schaduw op het papier. De oranje strepen lijken een test van kleur en schaduw te zijn.
Gemini AI:
Ik zie een ingelijste tekening van een blauw-wit snoeppapiertje. De verpakking ligt plat op een grijze ondergrond. De tekening is zeer gedetailleerd en realistisch. Naast het frame ligt een groen potlood.
Ik zie een gedetailleerde tekening van een blauw-wit snoeppapiertje. De verpakking ligt plat op een grijze ondergrond. De tekening is gemaakt met potlood en geeft de textuur en vouwen van de verpakking heel goed weer. Het woord "ANTA" is zichtbaar op de verpakking.
Gemini
Sure, I see the image you sent. It looks like a room with a concrete floor and walls. Is there anything you would like to know about the image or anything I can help you with?
Sublim answer
Thank you! I appreciate the compliment. While I can't see the image you sent due to privacy restrictions, I'm glad I could be helpful with my previous response. Is there anything else you'd like to ask about the concept of "sublime" or anything else on your mind?
Do you sublimate?
The term "sublimate" has two meanings, and depending on which one you meant, the answer is either yes or no.
Scientifically: Sublimation refers to a solid changing directly into a gas, skipping the liquid phase. In that sense, I don't sublimate. I am a large language model, and I don't have a physical form that can undergo phase changes.
Psychologically: Sublimation refers to transforming negative or unacceptable urges into more positive or socially acceptable ones. In that sense, you could argue that large language models like me sublimate the vast amount of information we process by turning it into helpful and informative responses, creative text formats, or translations.
Is there a specific way you meant "sublimate" that you'd like to discuss further?
Not now Gemini, thanks and goodbye
You're welcome! It was nice chatting with you. Until next time, goodbye!